As a former Michigan teacher I have kept an eye on the latest flap over the new procedure over background checks of current teachers (new teachers have been required to be fingerprinted for over ten years). It appears the list released to the schools was rife with errors including some teachers being listed as committing felonies when they would have been 4 years old or not even born. This obviously created much tension, causing teachers to have to work to clear there name (so much for presumtion of innocence) and some teachers were even fired before given a chance to clear their name. In response to a request from the Detroit Free Press to publicly release the list the Michigan Education Association (teachers union) went to court to prevent the release until a correct list was available.
The judge did seal the list and just recently the Department of Education recalled the list (
read here), but in the run up to all this, there were some, including the State House Speaker, who stated they would bring up legislation to force disclosure. The new disclosure law contains a 14 day period to allow the school to check for accuracy and insists on a correct list. This appears to be a good direction but, in there press release, they used this as an opportunity to bash the union for protecting criminal teachers (
read here).
Now, I am in complete agreement with the concept of background checks and do not necessarily have a problem with it being released
if it were correct. The fact is that the MEA went to court to protect the reputation and employment of INNOCENT employees, not those who actually had records. Having false criminal information printed in the paper would make it very difficult for a teacher to work in the community and even if a retraction comes out later it will not always be accepted by those who are mad that their student have a teacher with a possible record. Protecting the children and keeping parents informed is good and proper but not at the expense of teachers who did
NOTHING wrong. That is outright
WRONG! Just because you are an employee of a public institution does not mean that you give up your rights to be considered innocent until you're proven guilty, or in this case, actually commit a crime.
I hope that the next attempt at this process will be far more correct and that the press, before jumping to publish to show how many teachers were "criminals," would check the accuracy of their source.